Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Czech
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Czechs
Alaskan Athabascans
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 60.0% |
| Range | 98.1% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 27.9% | 25.9% |
| Median | 27.1% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nonimmigrants (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |