Turkish vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Turkish
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Turks
Alaskan Athabascans
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
46.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,630,729 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.46%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 40.4% | 60.0% |
| Range | 37.3% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 26.9% | 25.9% |
| Median | 27.6% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Turkey (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
| Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
| Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |