Swiss vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Swiss
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Swiss
Alaskan Athabascans
27.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
81.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,540,276 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.42%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 60.6% | 60.0% |
| Range | 57.5% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 30.1% | 25.9% |
| Median | 28.5% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (27.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Brazilian (27.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Chile (27.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Basque (27.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hungarian (27.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 81.7 /100 | #141 | Excellent 27.7% |
| Swiss | 81.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 80.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 27.7% |
| Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 27.7% |
| Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
| Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |