Israeli vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Israeli
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Israelis
Alaskan Athabascans
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
53.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,876,697 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 12.3% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 69.2% | 60.0% |
| Range | 56.9% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 31.3% | 25.9% |
| Median | 28.5% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.1% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Blackfeet (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Cherokee (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Seminole (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |