Navajo vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Navajo
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Navajo
Alaskan Athabascans
26.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,710,255 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 2.9% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 60.0% |
Range | 57.4% | 56.7% |
Mean | 25.9% | 25.9% |
Median | 26.0% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Immigrants from England (26.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (26.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (26.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 26.9% |
Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 26.9% |
Navajo | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | England | 3.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 26.9% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 26.9% |
Australians | 2.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 26.9% |
Jamaicans | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 26.9% |
Potawatomi | 2.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 2.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 26.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |