Aleut vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Aleut
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Aleuts
Alaskan Athabascans
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
46.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,770,627 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.46%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 4.6% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 60.0% |
Range | 62.1% | 56.7% |
Mean | 26.8% | 25.9% |
Median | 26.2% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.9% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.2% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Turkish (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Turkey (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Nonimmigrants (27.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |
Aleuts | 46.7 /100 | #181 | Average 27.4% |