Czech vs Romanian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Czech
Romanian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Czechs
Romanians
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Romanian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,533,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Romanian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 76.1% |
| Range | 98.1% | 72.4% |
| Mean | 27.9% | 29.3% |
| Median | 27.1% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 31.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Romanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |