Bhutanese vs New Zealander Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Bhutanese
New Zealander
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Bhutanese
New Zealanders
27.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
25.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs New Zealander Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,969,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 27.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,880,294 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.418 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.64%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | New Zealander |
Minimum | 12.8% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 44.7% | 55.8% |
Range | 31.9% | 52.1% |
Mean | 26.4% | 26.4% |
Median | 27.0% | 26.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.6% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and New Zealanders by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are American (27.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Kiowa (27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sudan (27.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (27.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (27.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Bhutanese | 25.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 27.3% |
Americans | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 27.3% |
Kiowa | 22.2 /100 | #203 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 21.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 20.3 /100 | #205 | Fair 27.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 27.2% |
Haitians | 19.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |