Navajo vs New Zealander Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Navajo
New Zealander
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Navajo
New Zealanders
26.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs New Zealander Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,710,255 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,880,294 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.418 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.65%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.9% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 55.8% |
Range | 57.4% | 52.1% |
Mean | 25.9% | 26.4% |
Median | 26.0% | 26.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and New Zealanders by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Immigrants from Bulgaria (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (26.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Netherlands (26.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Cape Verdean (26.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pima (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Czechoslovakian (27.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 26.9% |
Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 26.9% |
Navajo | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 26.9% |