Cheyenne vs Chippewa Currently Married
COMPARE
Cheyenne
 Chippewa
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Cheyenne
Chippewa
42.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Chippewa Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,721,070 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337 and weighted average of 42.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,057,083 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.709 and weighted average of 43.2%, a difference of 2.3%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cheyenne | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 23.7% | 5.1% | 
| Maximum | 62.3% | 73.1% | 
| Range | 38.6% | 68.0% | 
| Mean | 45.6% | 38.0% | 
| Median | 46.1% | 42.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.6% | 26.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 47.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 21.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 14.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 14.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne and Chippewa by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Immigrants from Honduras (42.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Menominee (42.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (42.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Africa (42.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% | 
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |