Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uruguay GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Immigrants from Uruguay
 GED/Equivalency
GED/Equivalency Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Uruguay
83.8%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.4%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uruguay GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 83.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,259,667 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 84.4%, a difference of 0.73%.
 
GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uruguay | 
| Minimum | 70.4% | 62.5% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 29.6% | 37.5% | 
| Mean | 81.5% | 82.2% | 
| Median | 81.5% | 84.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 78.6% | 79.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.3% | 87.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 7.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 10.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 10.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uruguay by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Senegal (83.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (83.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (83.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Cherokee (83.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sri Lankan (84.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Colombia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (84.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (84.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 5.4 /100 | #227  | Tragic 84.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 4.9 /100 | #228  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 4.6 /100 | #229  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 4.5 /100 | #230  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 4.3 /100 | #231  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | South America | 4.2 /100 | #232  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #233  | Tragic 84.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.6 /100 | #234  | Tragic 84.3%  | 
| Ghanaians | 3.5 /100 | #235  | Tragic 84.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 3.5 /100 | #236  | Tragic 84.3%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 3.0 /100 | #237  | Tragic 84.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 2.7 /100 | #238  | Tragic 84.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 2.6 /100 | #239  | Tragic 84.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 2.5 /100 | #240  | Tragic 84.1%  | 
| Senegalese | 1.9 /100 | #241  | Tragic 84.0%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 1.9 /100 | #242  | Tragic 84.0%  | 
| Cherokee | 1.3 /100 | #243  | Tragic 83.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.3 /100 | #244  | Tragic 83.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.2 /100 | #245  | Tragic 83.8%  | 
| Chickasaw | 1.2 /100 | #246  | Tragic 83.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 1.1 /100 | #247  | Tragic 83.8%  |