Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Netherlands GED/Equivalency

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,590,907 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 88.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,874,463 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 88.0%, a difference of 0.50%.

GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Netherlands
Minimum	75.7%	76.1%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	24.3%	23.9%
Mean	90.2%	91.7%
Median	91.1%	92.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	87.3%	89.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	92.9%	95.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.6%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.5%	5.3%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Netherlands by GED/Equivalency

In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Danish (88.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (88.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (88.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (88.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belgium (88.3%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Korea (88.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (88.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Latvia (88.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Greek (88.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (88.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	GED/Equivalency
Bhutanese	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 88.4%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 88.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.7 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 88.4%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.7 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 88.4%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 88.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 88.3%
Immigrants \| Austria	99.7 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 88.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 88.3%
Immigrants \| Israel	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 88.2%
Italians	99.6 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 88.2%
Finns	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 88.2%
Cambodians	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 88.2%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.6 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 88.2%
Macedonians	99.5 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 88.1%
Czechs	99.5 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 88.1%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	99.5 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 88.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.5 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 88.1%
Greeks	99.5 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 88.1%
Australians	99.5 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 88.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.5 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 88.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.4 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 88.0%