Yuman vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Yuman
 Tsimshian
 Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Yuman
Tsimshian
15.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,205 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 5.8%.
 
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Tsimshian | 
| Minimum | 3.9% | 11.4% | 
| Maximum | 48.4% | 29.2% | 
| Range | 44.5% | 17.8% | 
| Mean | 20.2% | 19.4% | 
| Median | 18.2% | 15.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 27.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.3% | 15.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 7.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 6.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (15.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Alaskan Athabascan (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 15.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 17.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 17.6%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 18.7%  |