Tohono O'odham vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Tsimshian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Tsimshian
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,717,576 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 0.11%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 8.7% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 29.2% |
Range | 91.3% | 17.8% |
Mean | 28.2% | 19.4% |
Median | 21.7% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.86%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |