Kiowa vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Kiowa
Tsimshian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Kiowa
Tsimshian
17.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,000 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fa36/1fa368fdfef0e75ba9b2f33d1fb8a59991904bc8" alt="Kiowa vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64"
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 8.3% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 46.2% | 29.2% |
Range | 37.8% | 17.8% |
Mean | 21.6% | 19.4% |
Median | 22.4% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.8%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |