Bermudan vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bermudan
Spanish American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bermudans
Spanish American Indians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,148,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 6.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bermudan | Spanish American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 11.7% | 8.6% |
| Range | 10.7% | 7.1% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |