Tsimshian vs Osage Female Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Osage
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Osage
16.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Osage Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,541 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 17.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Osage |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 30.9% | 34.3% |
| Range | 26.4% | 28.1% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 18.3% |
| Median | 16.6% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Osage by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Houma (16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 0.94%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 6.2%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and Creek (15.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Cape Verdean (14.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Yuman (14.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (14.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Pima (14.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |