Tsimshian vs Dutch West Indian Female Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
 Dutch West Indian
 Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Dutch West Indians
16.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Dutch West Indian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,770,005 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 11.8%.
 
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Dutch West Indian | 
| Minimum | 4.5% | 2.6% | 
| Maximum | 30.9% | 41.1% | 
| Range | 26.4% | 38.5% | 
| Mean | 17.3% | 18.3% | 
| Median | 16.6% | 18.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 21.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 8.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Dutch West Indians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Houma (16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 0.94%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 6.2%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and Creek (15.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and Cherokee (14.9%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.7%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 16.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 16.8%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 16.9%  |