Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Lithuanian Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,551,406 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,646,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.58%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bangladesh	Lithuanian
Minimum	0.20%	2.9%
Maximum	21.3%	67.6%
Range	21.1%	64.7%
Mean	10.9%	16.1%
Median	10.4%	11.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.5%	9.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.9%	19.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	9.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.1%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.1%	12.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Lithuanians by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Arab (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Immigrants \| Ecuador	92.5 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 10.7%
Greeks	92.3 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 10.7%
Salvadorans	91.9 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	91.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 10.7%
Costa Ricans	91.4 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Scotland	91.3 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 10.7%
Australians	90.7 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 10.8%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	90.6 /100 \| #142	Exceptional 10.8%
Sierra Leoneans	89.7 /100 \| #143	Excellent 10.8%
Lithuanians	88.7 /100 \| #144	Excellent 10.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	85.6 /100 \| #145	Excellent 10.9%
South American Indians	83.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	83.4 /100 \| #147	Excellent 10.9%
Arabs	82.7 /100 \| #148	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	81.1 /100 \| #149	Excellent 10.9%
Syrians	79.8 /100 \| #150	Good 11.0%
New Zealanders	79.3 /100 \| #151	Good 11.0%
Ukrainians	78.0 /100 \| #152	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| England	77.4 /100 \| #153	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| Canada	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 11.0%