Tongan vs Immigrants from Iran Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Iran
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Iran
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Iran Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,879,747 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Iran |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 52.5% |
| Range | 16.0% | 51.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Iran by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |