South African vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
South African
Yugoslavian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
South Africans
Yugoslavians
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,698,583 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 26.1% |
| Range | 17.3% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 15.9% |
| Median | 12.9% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |