Albanian vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Albanian
 Yugoslavian
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Albanians
Yugoslavians
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,265,298 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,698,583 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Albanian | Yugoslavian | 
| Minimum | 8.2% | 2.9% | 
| Maximum | 27.5% | 26.1% | 
| Range | 19.3% | 23.2% | 
| Mean | 16.3% | 15.9% | 
| Median | 16.2% | 16.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 14.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 17.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Arapaho (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Irish | 98.1 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Paraguayans | 98.0 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Palestinians | 98.0 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169  | Good 17.2%  |