South African vs White/Caucasian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
South African
White/Caucasian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
South Africans
Whites/Caucasians
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs White/Caucasian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,856,433 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.748 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.44%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 14.3% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 20.5% |
| Range | 17.3% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 17.7% |
| Median | 12.9% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Whites/Caucasians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Vietnam (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |