Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Immigrants from El Salvador
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Immigrants from El Salvador
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
78.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,945,827 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,605,888 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 4.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Range | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.73% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 0.69% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Finnish (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Belgian (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Norway (2.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
| South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |
| Finns | 78.3 /100 | #148 | Good 2.1% |
| Colombians | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 2.1% |
| Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
| Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |