Shoshone vs British West Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Shoshone
British West Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Shoshone
British West Indians
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs British West Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,618,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,684,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 2.4%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | British West Indian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 12.1% |
Range | 21.6% | 10.2% |
Mean | 9.7% | 6.8% |
Median | 8.2% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and British West Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |