Samoan vs Guatemalan Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Samoan
Guatemalan
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Samoans
Guatemalans
25.4%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Guatemalan Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,691,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,717,949 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 25.5%, a difference of 0.40%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 72.2% | 79.2% |
| Range | 66.4% | 69.2% |
| Mean | 27.2% | 29.0% |
| Median | 25.3% | 26.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Guatemalans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Iroquois (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cape Verdean (25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Hawaiian (25.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Latin America (25.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Hawaiian (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latin America (25.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (25.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (25.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Iroquois (25.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.5 /100 | #255 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Samoans | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Hawaiians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Guatemalans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Hmong | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Japanese | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 25.7% |