Russian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Netherlands
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Netherlands
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,838,654 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Netherlands |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 16.5% |
| Range | 74.4% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Netherlands by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |