Russian vs Immigrants from Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Africa
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,140,674 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.32%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 19.4% |
| Range | 74.4% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |