Russian vs Immigrants from Serbia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Serbia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Serbia
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Serbia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,742,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Serbia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 13.9% |
Range | 74.4% | 12.5% |
Mean | 9.5% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Serbia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.32%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |