Malaysian vs Native Hawaiian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Native Hawaiian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Native Hawaiians
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Native Hawaiian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,907,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,613,173 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 0.090% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 9.5% | 6.3% |
Range | 9.4% | 5.6% |
Mean | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.98% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Native Hawaiians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), French (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |