Malaysian vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Chickasaw
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Chickasaw
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,907,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,605,375 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 12.6%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.090% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 11.8% |
| Range | 9.4% | 11.4% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.9% |
| Median | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), French (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Navajo (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (2.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Dominica (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Comanche (2.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 2.9% |