Macedonian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Male Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
 Immigrants from Uruguay
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Immigrants from Uruguay
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,656,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Immigrants from Uruguay | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 8.9% | 
| Maximum | 21.7% | 20.1% | 
| Range | 20.1% | 11.1% | 
| Mean | 10.8% | 13.3% | 
| Median | 11.0% | 11.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 15.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Immigrants from Uruguay by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131  | Excellent 11.0%  |