Luxembourger vs Bhutanese 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Luxembourger
 Bhutanese
 2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Luxembourgers
Bhutanese
59.1%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
59.1%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Bhutanese 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,657,746 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 59.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,207,959 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 59.1%, a difference of 0.030%.
 
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Bhutanese | 
| Minimum | 46.0% | 19.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 54.0% | 80.3% | 
| Mean | 71.7% | 62.8% | 
| Median | 69.5% | 63.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 58.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.1% | 71.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 12.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 13.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 13.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Bhutanese by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Chickasaw (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Laos (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Chickasaw (59.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Laos (59.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household | 
| French | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 59.8% | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 59.7% | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 59.6% | 
| Yaqui | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 59.3% | 
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 59.3% | 
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 59.3% | 
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 59.3% | 
| Spaniards | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 59.2% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 59.2% | 
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 59.2% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 59.1% | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 59.1% | 
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 59.0% | 
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 59.0% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 58.9% | 
| Spanish Americans | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 58.9% | 
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 58.9% | 
| Osage | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 58.8% | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 58.8% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 58.7% | 
| Portuguese | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 58.6% |