Latvian vs Central American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Central American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Latvians
Central American Indians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Central American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,695,390 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 0.95% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 15.5% |
Range | 16.2% | 14.6% |
Mean | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Median | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Central American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Serbian (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |