Ecuadorian vs Australian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Australian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Australians
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Australian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,605,985 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,011,363 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.67%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 38.6% |
| Range | 21.2% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 14.3% |
| Median | 10.3% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Australians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Albania (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Albanians | 94.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |