Jamaican vs Indian (Asian) Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Jamaican
 Indian (Asian)
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Jamaicans
Indians (Asian)
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Indian (Asian) Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,784,846 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,958,947 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Indian (Asian) | 
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.32% | 
| Maximum | 5.6% | 5.5% | 
| Range | 5.0% | 5.1% | 
| Mean | 2.5% | 2.6% | 
| Median | 2.5% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.54% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 0.64% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 0.64% | 
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Indians (Asian) by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.3 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 2.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 2.6%  | 
| Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 2.7%  |