South American vs Indian (Asian) Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American
Indian (Asian)
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South Americans
Indians (Asian)
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Indian (Asian) Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,776,851 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,958,947 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Range | 6.0% | 5.1% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.54% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Indians (Asian) by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |