Indonesian vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indonesian
Immigrants from Mexico
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indonesians
Immigrants from Mexico
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,682,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.16%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Immigrants from Mexico |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 26.4% |
| Range | 10.2% | 25.1% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Immigrants from Mexico by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |