Indonesian vs Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indonesian
Mexican American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indonesians
Mexican American Indians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,682,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.28%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 19.4% |
| Range | 10.2% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |