Malaysian vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Mexico
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Mexico
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,050,790 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Mexico |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 26.4% |
| Range | 15.2% | 25.1% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Mexico by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |