Indonesian vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Indonesian
Immigrants from Japan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Indonesians
Immigrants from Japan
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,712,872 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indonesian | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 6.0% | 17.2% |
Range | 4.3% | 16.8% |
Mean | 3.1% | 4.2% |
Median | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.76% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Serbia (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Japanese (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |