Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from Japan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from Japan
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 42.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 13.7% | 17.2% |
| Range | 11.7% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 4.2% |
| Median | 5.9% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |