Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Vietnamese Disability Age 5 to 17

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,300,989 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,164,131 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.69%.

Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Vietnamese
Minimum	0.62%	1.4%
Maximum	30.2%	18.6%
Range	29.6%	17.2%
Mean	5.5%	5.5%
Median	4.8%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.8%	3.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.7%	6.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.9%	2.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.2%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.2%	2.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Vietnamese by Disability Age 5 to 17

In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Australia (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Korean (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Tongan (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Egyptian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 5 to 17
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 5.0%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Philippines	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 5.0%
Egyptians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 5.0%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 5.0%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 5.0%
Vietnamese	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 5.1%
Koreans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 5.1%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 5.1%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 5.1%
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 5.1%