Immigrants from Romania vs Panamanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Panamanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Panamanians
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
48.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
47.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Panamanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,976,190 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,114,071 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 0.14%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Panamanian |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 10.3% | 35.6% |
| Range | 9.4% | 34.9% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 6.2% |
| Median | 3.4% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Panamanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Japanese (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Serbia (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Serbia (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |