Immigrants from Hungary vs Russian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
 Russian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Russians
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Russian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,680,611 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.934 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,868,935 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Russian | 
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.73% | 
| Maximum | 32.0% | 18.2% | 
| Range | 31.9% | 17.5% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.2% | 
| Median | 3.8% | 3.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Russians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223  | Tragic 3.2%  |