Immigrants from North America vs Swiss Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Swiss
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Swiss
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Swiss Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,279,927 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 2.3%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Swiss |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 25.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 24.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 5.1% |
Median | 7.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Swiss by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Canada (3.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (3.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovene (3.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Germany (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |