Immigrants from Congo vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Bangladeshi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Bangladeshis
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,115,389 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.39%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 12.2% | 15.6% |
| Range | 12.0% | 12.2% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Bangladeshis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |