Immigrants from Jordan vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
 Indian (Asian)
 Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Indians (Asian)
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,224,885 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.73%.
 
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Indian (Asian) | 
| Minimum | 0.35% | 0.22% | 
| Maximum | 5.6% | 7.5% | 
| Range | 5.2% | 7.3% | 
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.4% | 
| Median | 2.4% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.64% | 0.76% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 0.78% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 0.77% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Indians (Asian) by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 2.3%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 2.4%  |