Immigrants from Italy vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Arabs
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,167,823 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.87%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Arab |
Minimum | 0.65% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 17.8% |
Range | 13.4% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.5% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |