Immigrants from Guatemala vs Sudanese Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Sudanese
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Sudanese
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Sudanese Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,228,850 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,131,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.64%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 25.6% |
| Range | 24.7% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 12.4% |
| Median | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Sudanese by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |